Which aspect is NOT usually considered in process complexity analysis?

When performing a process complexity analysis, the focus is typically on elements that affect the intricacies of the workflow being automated. While the number of screens, variations or scenarios, and the types of applications used all contribute significantly to understanding how complex a process is, cost of automation does not directly reflect complexity itself.

The number of screens indicates how many user interactions are involved, which can complicate the automation due to potential variations in user inputs and screen navigation. Variations or scenarios highlight the different paths a process might take, adding layers of complexity that need to be managed in automation. The type of applications determines the technical environment and compatibility aspects, influencing how difficult or straightforward it is to implement automation.

On the other hand, cost of automation is more related to the resources required to implement an automation solution and its financial implications rather than the inherent complexity of the processes themselves. This is generally evaluated after the complexity analysis to decide whether or not to proceed with automation. Hence, considering cost in the context of process complexity analysis does not align with the typical focus areas for assessing complexity.